For a constant m and r, the variability of the error in the registrations
only depends on the homology error between point pairs. The homology error
in each modality may be thought of as an effective Gaussian error envelope.
The use of is preferred over
because it allows a more direct
comparison to the description of quantity which gives rise to homology error
the most, the finite spatial resolution,
, and, perhaps less intuitively,
the contribution of human interaction,
[Hil88]. An operator unfamiliar with the functional nature of the
information provided by
Tc-HMPAO SPECT images will undoubtedly introduce greater homology errors
and hence larger registrations errors. From linear systems theory,
and
characterise the components of a
cascaded linear system (see figure 2.6) which combine in quadrature
(Appendix G in [SP87] assuming Gaussian distributions of errors)
to convolute the exact location of an anatomical point within some Gaussian
distribution of uncertainty as described by
The homology error in a SPECT/MR registration similarly combines the homology error contributions of each modality in quadrature such that
Due to SPECT's anisotropic spatial resolution, possible
distortions in MR and the interpretive faculties of the operator involved,
is in general a likewise anisotropic Gaussian
distribution and non-homogeneous in space because of its dependence on
and the general intra-observer anatomical
variability of
[Sor]. Additionally, the
approximation may be made wherein
so that
may be measured for a specific anatomical
location in practice by picking the same point N times and calculating
the standard deviations (equal to
for normal
distributions) in the three ordinates. With interactive display
software which includes on the fly magnification control and
inter-plane display updates toggled to the cursor position,
it is found that
is very small
so that
may further be approximated by
(henceforth simply referred to as
from
the approximation) when a knowledgeable operator is involved. Point
simulations may produce various
and
for different combinations of m, r and
, where N
un-registered point sets are created by randomly perturbing the same
target point set within the homogeneous 3-D Gaussian error envelope
of
. The data from the point simulations study may serve
as a calibration file representing ideal spherically symmetric
configurations for different r, m, and
. Similarly, real
scan studies with the 3-D ``Hoffman'' brain phantom (Data Spectrum
Corporation, Chapel Hill, NC) with external fiducials as a basis for
exact registrations may be registered N times for specific m, the
modality's
, and configuration (unequal r in each
ordinate because of the brain's roughly oblong shape).
and
for each ordinate and about
each plane from the real scan studies are interpreted in the context
of the results from the point simulation studies.