My Ph.D. work is focused on investigating certain aspects of pitch processing and absolute pitch in musicians. Below, you can find PDF versions of conference posters presented in the last few years.
Organization for Human Brain Mapping, New York City, 2003Tonal working memory in absolute pitch musicians. P. Bermudez & R.J. Zatorre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, H3A 2B4 Introduction In music, working memory is of particular importance since sounds unfold over time and must be held for relationships between events to be discerned. This maintenance and manipulation of information in real time contributes to many complex cognitive processes and seems to be subserved by discrete areas of the frontal cortex. It has been suggested that Absolute Pitch (AP), the ability to identify the names of musical pitches without reference to a standard, may diminish typical working memory requirements in the processing of tonal information amongst its possessors. Based on event-related potential (ERP) experiments1, it has been hypothesized that AP subjects do not update their working memory representation upon hearing new tones because the tones correspond to a fixed standard and, therefore, do not require maintenance in working memory. Evidence for this assertion comes from the absence or reduction of an ERP component (the P300, thought to be an index of working memory updating2) among AP subjects3,4. We hypothesized that regions involved in auditory working memory would therefore be more active in non-AP than AP musicians when performing an oddball-type task as part of an event-related fMRI paradigm. Methods Subjects Nine highly trained musicians were screened and categorized into one of two groups: AP and non-AP possessors. This was done by means of a computer-administered AP test which presented second-long synthetic tones ranging from C3 to B5 and prompted the subject for chroma and octave judgments for each note (see Figure 1 for distributions of average performance). Scanning Scanning was performed on a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner using temporally sparse acquisitions in an event-related design (Figure 2). The functional volume consisted of 20 contiguous 5 mm-thick axial T2* gradient echo EPIs aligned in plane with the Sylvian fissure. A T1-weighted volume was acquired for anatomical localization in each individual. Stimuli consisted of a frequent tone (C4, 261.62Hz) and an oddball tone (G4, 391.99Hz) of 1 s duration. There were two runs of 120 volume acquisitions at 10 second intervals with 5 stimuli per interval. Stimulus presentation was grouped into three trial types: 1) oddball, where 1 of the 5 stimuli presented (20%) was an infrequent tone, 2) frequent, where all stimuli were frequent tones and, 3) silence. Subjects were instructed to respond with a left button mouse click to frequent stimuli and a right button click to oddball stimuli. Results Both the AP and non-AP groups showed activity in primary and secondary auditory cortices related to the perception of auditory stimuli, as well as left posterior parietal activity. The principal contrast of interest, where activity related to the perception of the oddball stimulus is compared between groups, revealed the hypothesized difference in the frontal cortex thought to reflect differential use of working memory (Figure 3). References: 1) Klein et al. (1984) Science, 223, 1306-1309. 2) Donchin & Coles (1988) Behav. Brain Sci., 11, 357-374. 3) Hantz et al. (1992) Music Percept., 10, 25-42. 4) Wayman et al. (1992) J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 3527-3531. This work was funded by the International Foundation for Music Research (IFMR) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). |